As you continue, thestudycorp.com<\/a> has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order <\/a>with us.<\/p>\n\n\n\n PHI 413 Benchmark \u2013 Patient\u2019s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Essay<\/p>\n\n\n\n Healing and Autonomy<\/p>\n\n\n\n The given case study is about Mike and Joanne. They are Samuel and James parents. James has been diagnosed with acute glomerulonephritis, kidney failure. According to James\u2019s physician, James requires to undergo dialysis as a way of maintaining his kidney functions. However, James\u2019s parents are of the opinion that he seeks religious healings from his pastor. The physician agrees to their decision only for James to be brought back two days later with worsening health status. He was started on dialysis and requires urgent kidney transplant. Therefore, this research paper examines the case study with a focus on the various aspects that should be considered for the health and wellbeing of James.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Should the Physician Allow Mike to Continue Making Decisions that Seem to him to be Irrational and Harmful to James?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n The physician should not allow Mike to make decisions that irrational and harmful to James. Firstly, healthcare providers have the obligation of ensuring that the safety of the patient is protected. They make decisions that aim at optimizing the wellbeing, health, and recovery of the patients from their PHI 413 Benchmark \u2013 Patient\u2019s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis Essay<\/p>\n\n\n\n conditions (Scott, 2017). Healthcare providers also play the role of patient advocates. This implies that they fight for their patients in situations where their health and lives are at risk. An example is the case study where it is evident that Mike\u2019s decisions are causing more harm to James than promoting his recovery.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The physician also has knowledge on issues that cause ethical dilemmas in his practice. An example of such issue is the conflict between respecting the autonomy of the caregivers and taking decisions that promote the health and wellbeing of the patient. In such situations, healthcare providers are expected to make ethical decisions that will not only protect the health of the vulnerable but also demonstrate prioritization of the health issues affecting the population. Consequently, the physician should not allow Mike to make decisions in a way that facilitates the understanding of the family. This includes explaining to the family about the prognosis of their son and possible outcomes if immediate interventions are not adopted. PHI 413 Benchmark \u2013 Patient\u2019s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Essay<\/p>\n\n\n\n The decision of not allowing Mike to make decisions concerning James\u2019s health is not a violation of the autonomy of the patient. The physician will instead be promoting his autonomy by ensuring that the best interventions are used to promote his health. Healthcare providers often experiences ethical dilemmas in their practice. In such situations, they are expected to prioritize the needs of the patient, hence, the soundness of the decision made. PHI 413 Benchmark \u2013 Patient\u2019s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis Essay<\/p>\n\n\n\n How Ought Christians Think about Sickness and Health? How should a Christian Think about Medical Intervention? What Should Mike as a Christian do? How should he Reason about Trusting God and Treating James?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n There exist significant differences in the way in which Christians and physicians view or understand a disease. For healthcare providers, a disease arises from a change in the normal physiological processes in the body. However, this view might be different according to religion. For example, it can be seen from the case study that Mike and Joanne are strong believers of Christianity. They believe that everything that happens in their lives is attributed to God. According to some Christians, a disease is a symbol of God\u2019s test of their faith or believes. They consider that a disease is something that God sent to them to know if they have strong faith in him. The best approach to an illness to such Christians is holding to a belief that the disease will heal by itself once God is through testing them. God is therefore the healer. Some Christians also perceive a disease to be God\u2019s punishment. According to them, God sends a disease to human beings as a way of showing his dissatisfaction with their behaviors. As a result, they must live in ways that align with God\u2019s teachings for the disease to be healed. The last group of Christians perceives physicians or healthcare providers to be sent by God to help them manage their diseases. In this case, the healthcare providers assist God in promoting the health and wellbeing of his creations. Mike\u2019s family perceives James\u2019s condition as God\u2019s test of his faith in him. Therefore, the strongly believe that God will heal him once he has finished testing their faith. PHI 413 Benchmark \u2013 Patient\u2019s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Essay<\/p>\n\n\n\n It is therefore important that Christians consider medical interventions as part of the ways in which God\u2019s efforts to promoting health and wellbeing are promoted. They should believe that medical interventions would enable them to see the doings of God through their recovery from the disease. Based on this, Mike should allow medical interventions to be utilized for the recovery and wellbeing of his son. He should have faith in God that the dialysis and kidney transplant will restore his son\u2019s health. He should also consider the physician and other healthcare providers as part of the angels of God. Therefore, he should hold on the belief that God\u2019s intentions will manifest through their medical interventions. Through this, Mike will be promoting beneficence and non-maleficence by ensuring that the safest care is given to his son. Furthermore, the decision will eliminate any future blames if medical interventions prove ineffective in promoting James\u2019s recovery. PHI 413 Benchmark \u2013 Patient\u2019s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis Essay<\/p>\n\n\n\n How Would Spiritual Needs Assessment Help the Physician Assist Mike Determine Interventions for James and for his Family or Others involved in his Care<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Spiritual assessment is an important component in the provision of holistic care to the patients. Spiritual assessment would have benefited the effective management of James\u2019s condition in a number of ways. Firstly, the physician could have learned about the spiritual needs of the family and their relationship with the care needed by the patient. It would have enabled him to explore the manner in which medical interventions can be used in a manner that does not conflict with the interests and expectations of the family. Spiritual assessment could have also enabled the physician to identify the teams that should be involved in making decisions on the care needed by the patient (Doreen, 2016). For example, he would have considered the need for incorporating the efforts of the family\u2019s spiritual leader in deciding on the best treatment approach for the patient. PHI 413 Benchmark \u2013 Patient\u2019s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Essay<\/p>\n\n\n\n Spiritual needs assessment would have also enabled the physician to identify the family\u2019s values, beliefs, and practices that are needed to ensure the adoption and sustainability of the adopted interventions. He could have also learned about the ways in which his values, beliefs, and practices are likely to influence the treatment decisions for the patient. For example, being medical personnel, he would have used biblical examples to increase the understanding of the family about the need for medical interventions (Doreen, 2016). Through it, he could have made them understand the interrelationship between medicine and religion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n In summary, the case study has shown the manner in which religion can influence the uptake of health interventions. It has revealed the manner in which the religious beliefs of the patients need to be incorporated into care for optimum health to be achieved. Therefore, it is important that healthcare providers incorporate spiritual assessment into their plans of care. This will enable them to provide care that promote. PHI 413 Benchmark \u2013 Patient\u2019s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis Essay<\/p>\n\n\n\n Benchmark \u2013 Patient\\\u2019s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n In addition to the topic study materials, use the chart you completed and questions you answered in the Topic 3 about \\\u201dCase Study: Healing and Autonomy\\\u201d as the basis for your responses in this assignment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Answer the following questions about a patient\\\u2019s spiritual needs in light of the Christian worldview.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In 200-250 words, respond to the following: Should the physician allow Mike to continue making decisions that seem to him to be irrational and harmful to James, or would that mean a disrespect of a patient\\\u2019s autonomy? Explain your rationale.<\/strong><\/em> While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. PHI 413 Benchmark \u2013 Patient\u2019s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis Essay<\/p>\n\n\n\n This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Benchmark Information<\/p>\n\n\n\n This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:<\/p>\n\n\n\n BS in Health Sciences 1.2; BS Nursing (RN to BSN ) 5.2<\/p>\n\n\n\n Assess for the spiritual needs and provide appropriate interventions for individuals, families, and groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Attachments Due Date: 24-Oct-2021 at 11:59:59 PM Case Study: Healing and Autonomy<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Mike and Joanne are the parents of James and Samuel, identical twins born 8 years ago. James is currently suffering from acute glomerulonephritis, kidney failure. James was originally brought into the hospital for complications associated with a strep throat infection. The spread of the A streptococcus infection led to the subsequent kidney failure. James\u2019s condition was acute enough to warrant immediate treatment. Usually cases of acute glomerulonephritis caused by strep infection tend to improve on their own or with an antibiotic. However, James also had elevated blood pressure and enough fluid buildup that required temporary dialysis to relieve.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The attending physician suggested immediate dialysis. After some time of discussion with Joanne, Mike informs the physician that they are going to forego the dialysis and place their faith in God. Mike and Joanne had been moved by a sermon their pastor had given a week ago, and also had witnessed a close friend regain mobility when she was prayed over at a healing service after a serious stroke. They thought it more prudent to take James immediately to a faith healing service instead of putting James through multiple rounds of dialysis. Yet, Mike and Joanne agreed to return to the hospital after the faith healing services later in the week, and in hopes that James would be healed by then.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Two days later the family returned and was forced to place James on dialysis, as his condition had deteriorated. Mike felt perplexed and tormented by his decision to not treat James earlier. Had he not enough faith? Was God punishing him or James? To make matters worse, James\u2019s kidneys had deteriorated such that his dialysis was now not a temporary matter and was in need of a kidney transplant. Crushed and desperate, Mike and Joanne immediately offered to donate one of their own kidneys to James, but they were not compatible donors. Over the next few weeks, amidst daily rounds of dialysis, some of their close friends and church members also offered to donate a kidney to James. However, none of them were tissue matches. PHI 413 Benchmark \u2013 Patient\u2019s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis Essay<\/p>\n\n\n\n James\u2019s nephrologist called to schedule a private appointment with Mike and Joanne. James was stable, given the regular dialysis, but would require a kidney transplant within the year. Given the desperate situation, the nephrologist informed Mike and Joanne of a donor that was an ideal tissue match, but as of yet had not been considered\u2014James\u2019s brother Samuel.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Mike vacillates and struggles to decide whether he should have his other son Samuel lose a kidney or perhaps wait for God to do a miracle this time around. Perhaps this is where the real testing of his faith will come in? Mike reasons, \u201cThis time around it is a matter of life and death. What could require greater faith than that?\u201d PHI 413 Benchmark \u2013 Patient\u2019s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Essay<\/p>\n\n\n\n Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) Satisfactory (75.00%) Good (85.00%) Excellent (100.00%) As you continue, thestudycorp.com<\/a> has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order <\/a>with us. (Patient\u2019s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Essay)<\/p>\n\n\n\n Spiritual Needs Assessment and Intervention (C1.2, 5.2) 30.0% How a spiritual needs assessment would help the physician assist the father determine appropriate interventions for his son, his family, or others involved in the care of his son is not analyzed. How a spiritual needs assessment would help the physician assist the father determine appropriate interventions for his son, his family, or others involved in the care of his son is analyzed, but unclear. Analysis is not supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses. How a spiritual needs assessment would help the physician assist the father determine appropriate interventions for his son, his family, or others involved in the care of his son is clearly analyzed but lacks details. Analysis is not supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses. How a spiritual needs assessment would help the physician assist the father determine appropriate interventions for his son, his family, or others involved in the care of his son is clearly analyzed with details. Analysis is supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses. How a spiritual needs assessment would help the physician assist the father determine appropriate interventions for his son, his family, or others involved in the care of his son is clearly analyzed with a deep understanding of the connection between a spiritual needs assessment and providing appropriate interventions. Analysis is supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses. PHI 413 Benchmark \u2013 Patient\u2019s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Essay<\/p>\n\n\n\n Decision-Making, Christian Perspective, and the Principles of Beneficence and Nonmaleficence 30.0% Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are not analyzed according to the Christian perspective and the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence. Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are analyzed according to the Christian perspective and the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence, but the analysis is unclear. Analysis is not supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses. Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are clearly analyzed according to the Christian perspective and the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence but lacks details. Analysis is not supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses. Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are clearly analyzed with details according to the Christian perspective and the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence. Analysis is supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses. Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are analyzed with deep understanding of the complexity of the Christian perspective, as well as with the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence. Analysis is supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses. PHI 413 Benchmark \u2013 Patient\u2019s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Essay<\/p>\n\n\n\n Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent and\/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. PHI 413 Benchmark \u2013 Patient\u2019s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis Essay<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Organization, Effectiveness, and Format 10.0% Decision-Making and Principle of Autonomy<\/p>\n\n\n\n 60 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are analyzed from both perspectives with a deep understanding of the complexity of the principle of autonomy. Analysis is supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 51 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are clearly analyzed from both perspectives with details according to the principle of autonomy. Analysis is supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 45 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are clearly analyzed from both perspectives, but the analysis according to the principle of autonomy lack details. Analysis is not supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 39 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are analyzed from both perspectives, but the analysis according to the principle of autonomy is unclear. Analysis is not supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 0 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are not analyzed according to the principle of autonomy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Decision-Making, Christian Perspective, and the Principles of Beneficence and Nonmaleficence<\/p>\n\n\n\n 60 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are analyzed with deep understanding of the complexity of the Christian perspective, as well as with the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence. Analysis is supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 51 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are clearly analyzed with details according to the Christian perspective and the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence. Analysis is supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 45 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are clearly analyzed according to the Christian perspective and the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence but lacks details. Analysis is not supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 39 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are analyzed according to the Christian perspective and the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence, but the analysis is unclear. Analysis is not supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 0 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are not analyzed according to the Christian perspective and the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Spiritual Needs Assessment and Intervention (C1.2, 5.2)<\/p>\n\n\n\n 60 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n How a spiritual needs assessment would help the physician assist the father determine appropriate interventions for his son, his family, or others involved in the care of his son is clearly analyzed with a deep understanding of the connection between a spiritual needs assessment and providing appropriate interventions. Analysis is supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 51 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n How a spiritual needs assessment would help the physician assist the father determine appropriate interventions for his son, his family, or others involved in the care of his son is clearly analyzed with details. Analysis is supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 45 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n How a spiritual needs assessment would help the physician assist the father determine appropriate interventions for his son, his family, or others involved in the care of his son is clearly analyzed but lacks details. Analysis is not supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As you continue, thestudycorp.com<\/a> has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is\u00a0place an order\u00a0<\/a>with us. (Patient\u2019s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Essay)<\/p>\n\n\n\n 39 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n How a spiritual needs assessment would help the physician assist the father determine appropriate interventions for his son, his family, or others involved in the care of his son is analyzed, but unclear. Analysis is not supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 0 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n How a spiritual needs assessment would help the physician assist the father determine appropriate interventions for his son, his family, or others involved in the care of his son is not analyzed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)<\/p>\n\n\n\n 10 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 8.5 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 7.5 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 6.5 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 0 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)<\/p>\n\n\n\n 10 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 8.5 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 7.5 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 6.5 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Documentation of sources is inconsistent and\/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 0 points<\/p>\n\n\n\nPHI 413 Benchmark \u2013 Patient\u2019s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Essay<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
![\"PHI](\"https:\/\/www.onlinenursingessays.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/PHI-413-Benchmark-%E2%80%93-Patients-Spiritual-Needs-Case-Analysis-Essay-300x138.png\" "\\"\\"")
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In 400-500 words, respond to the following: How ought the Christian think about sickness and health? How should a Christian think about medical intervention? What should Mike as a Christian do? How should he reason about trusting God and treating James in relation to what is truly honoring the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence in James\\\u2019s care?<\/em>
In 200-250 words, respond to the following: How would a spiritual needs assessment help the physician assist Mike determine appropriate interventions for James and for his family or others involved in his care?<\/strong><\/em>
Remember to support your responses with the topic study materials.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
PHI-413V-RS-T3T5CaseStudyHealingAndAutonomy.docx
RUBRIC
Attempt Start Date: 18-Oct-2021 at 12:00:00 AM<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Maximum Points: 200.0 Please read instructions, look at example and rubric carefully, thanks. there is 1, 2 3 to this assignment<\/p>\n\n\n\n
PHI-413V PHI-413V-O504 Benchmark \u2013 Patient\u2019s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis 200.0<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Content 90.0%
PHI 413 Benchmark \u2013 Patient\u2019s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Essay Decision-Making and Principle of Autonomy 30.0% Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are not analyzed according to the principle of autonomy. Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are analyzed from both perspectives, but the analysis according to the principle of autonomy is unclear. Analysis is not supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses. Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are clearly analyzed from both perspectives, but the analysis according to the principle of autonomy lack details. Analysis is not supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses. Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are clearly analyzed from both perspectives with details according to the principle of autonomy. Analysis is supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses. Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are analyzed from both perspectives with a deep understanding of the complexity of the principle of autonomy. Analysis is supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses. PHI 413 Benchmark \u2013 Patient\u2019s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Essay<\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"Patient\u2019s](\"https:\/\/privateessaywriters.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/order-1024x334.jpg\" "\\"\\"")
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.<\/p>\n\n\n\nBenchmark \u2013 Patient\u2019s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis \u2013 Rubric<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Criteria Description<\/h6>\n\n\n\n
5. Excellent<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
4. Good<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
3. Satisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
2. Less Than Satisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
1. Unsatisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
Criteria Description<\/h6>\n\n\n\n
5. Excellent<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
4. Good<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
3. Satisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
2. Less Than Satisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
1. Unsatisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
Criteria Description<\/h6>\n\n\n\n
5. Excellent<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
4. Good<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
3. Satisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
2. Less Than Satisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
1. Unsatisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
Criteria Description<\/h6>\n\n\n\n
5. Excellent<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
4. Good<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
3. Satisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
2. Less Than Satisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
1. Unsatisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
Criteria Description<\/h6>\n\n\n\n
5. Excellent<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
4. Good<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
3. Satisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
2. Less Than Satisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
1. Unsatisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
Read More:<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n