As you continue, thestudycorp.com<\/a> has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order <\/a>with us.<\/p>\n\n\n\n NURS 6051 Literature Review The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies<\/p>\n\n\n\n Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n The use of technology to leverage care interventions in\u00a0different\u00a0clinical settings and facilities cannot be overemphasized because of the critical role that it plays in enhancing patient safety and care outcomes. Clinical systems are essential tools in improving patients\u2019 outcomes and efficiencies in healthcare delivery by reducing medication errors, promoting medication compliance and enabling providers to leverage technology for better decisions and informed interventions (Dykes et al., 2017). Personal health records or portals are some of the critical aspects that providers and healthcare systems use to support patients that have recently been diagnosed with diabetes. These portals offer access to health information from an organization\u2019s electronic health record (EHR) and allow patients to conduct different medical-associated tasks like electronically communicating with their providers and even recording their symptoms (Tapuria et al., 2021). The purpose of this paper is to offer an annotated bibliography of the impact of personal health records or patient portals for individuals newly diagnosed with diabetes.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Coughlin, S. S., Williams, L. B., & Hatzigeorgiou, C. (2017). A systematic review of studies<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n of web portals for patients with diabetes mellitus. MHealth, 3(6). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21037\/mhealth.2017.05.05<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n In this systematic review of studies on the portal<\/a> for patients with diabetes mellitus, the researchers evaluate the impact of patient health records to improve outcomes from interventions to control glycemic levels. The authors identified 12 studies on the topic that include three cross-sectional and five randomized controlled trials. The researchers required web portals meant for diabetes patients and those tethered to electronic medical records. The findings show that web portals enhance the ability of patients to communicate with their clinicians and attain enhanced glycemic control. The authors emphasize the need for additional research to understand the level of control for patients. However, they are categorical that web portals improve glycemic control for these patients.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The study shows that web portals are essential and improve outcomes for diabetic patients since they enhance communication between them and their clinicians. Through effective communication, clinicians improve efficiencies in care provisions for diabetes patients. The study indicates that providers should leverage technologies and encourage their patients to embrace them to reduce adverse disease outcomes. A critical lesson learned from the use of web portals based on the study is that few patients embrace this technology to enhance diabetes self-management and self-care. Consequently, providers should be trained to leverage its use to improve self-care interventions for patients in remote locations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n New technology\u2014and the application of existing technology\u2014only appears in healthcare settings after careful and significant research. The stakes are high, and new clinical systems need to offer evidence of positive impact on outcomes or efficiencies.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Nurse informaticists and healthcare leaders formulate clinical system strategies. As these strategies are often based on technology trends, informaticists and others have then benefited from consulting existing research to inform their thinking.<\/p>\n\n\n\n ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ON NURS<\/p>\n\n\n\n In this Assignment, you will review existing research focused on the application of clinical systems. After reviewing, you will summarize your findings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n To Prepare:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n The Assignment: (4-5 pages)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Be sure to address the following:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Module 4: Technologies Supporting Applied Practice and Optimal Patient Outcomes (Weeks 6-8)<\/p>\n\n\n\n Accessible player \u2013Downloads\u2013 Learning Objectives As you continue, thestudycorp.com<\/a> has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order <\/a>with us. (The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies)<\/p>\n\n\n\n Learning Resources Chapter 14, \u201cThe Electronic Health Record and Clinical Informatics\u201d (pp. 267\u2013287) Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases. Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases. Accessible player \u2013Downloads\u2013 Accessible player \u2013Downloads\u2013 Submit your completed Assignment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Please save your Assignment using the naming convention \u201cWK8Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)\u201d as the name.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Click the Week 8 Assignment Rubric <\/strong>to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Click the Week 8 Assignment <\/strong>link. You will also be able to \u201cView Rubric\u201d for grading criteria from this area.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer<\/strong> button. Find the document you saved as \u201cWK8Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)\u201d and click Open<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Click on the Submit<\/strong> button to complete your submission.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Due to the nature of this assignment, your instructor may require more than 5 days to provide you with quality feedback.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Rubric Detail<\/p>\n\n\n\n Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric\u2019s layout.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Name: NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric \u00b7 Properly identify 5 peer-reviewed articles selected. The responses accurately and thoroughly summarize in detail each study reviewed, explaining in detail the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As you continue, thestudycorp.com<\/a> has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is\u00a0place an order\u00a0<\/a>with us. (The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies)<\/p>\n\n\n\n Specific, accurate, and detailed examples are provided which fully support the responses. The responses summarize each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Accurate examples are provided which support the responses provided. The responses summarize each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described that is vague or inaccurate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Examples provided to support the responses are vague or inaccurate. The responses vaguely and inaccurately summarize each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described, or are missing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Examples provided to support the responses are vague and inaccurate, or are missing. Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused\u2013neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuationNURS 6051 Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Download Video w\/CC
Download Audio
Download Transcript
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Informatics Tools and Technologies [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Students will:
Evaluate healthcare technology trends for data and information in nursing practice and healthcare delivery
Analyze challenges and risks inherent in healthcare technology
Analyze healthcare technology benefits and risks for data safety, legislation, and patient care
Evaluate healthcare technology impact on patient outcomes, efficiencies, and data management
Analyze research on the application of clinical systems to improve outcomes and efficiencies<\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"The](\"https:\/\/privateessaywriters.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/order-1024x334.jpg\" "\\"\\"")
Due By
Assignment
Week 6, Days 1\u20132
Read\/Watch\/Listen to the Learning Resources.
Compose your initial Discussion post.
Week 6, Day 3
Post your initial Discussion post.
Begin to compose your Assignment.
Week 6, Days 4-5
Review peer Discussion posts.
Compose your peer Discussion responses.
Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 6, Day 6
Post at least two peer Discussion responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post).
Week 6, Day 7
Wrap up Discussion.
Week 7, Days 1-7
Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 8, Days 1-6
Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 8, Day 7
Deadline to submit your Assignment.
Photo Credit: Westend61<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Note: To access this week\u2019s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.
Required Readings
McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Chapter 15, \u201cInformatics Tools to Promote Patient Safety and Quality Outcomes\u201d (pp. 293\u2013317)
Chapter 16, \u201cPatient Engagement and Connected Health\u201d (pp. 323\u2013338)
Chapter 17, \u201cUsing Informatics to Promote Community\/Population Health\u201d (pp. 341\u2013355)
Chapter 18, \u201cTelenursing and Remote Access Telehealth\u201d (pp. 359\u2013388)
Dykes, P. C., Rozenblum, R., Dalal, A., Massaro, A., Chang, F., Clements, M., Collins, S. \u2026Bates, D. W. (2017). Prospective evaluation of a multifaceted intervention to improve outcomes in intensive care: The Promoting Respect and Ongoing Safety Through Patient Engagement Communication and Technology Study. Critical Care Medicine, 45(8), e806\u2013e813. doi:10.1097\/CCM.0000000000002449
HealthIT.gov. (2018c). What is an electronic health record (EHR)? Retrieved from https:\/\/www.healthit.gov\/faq\/what-electronic-health-record-ehr
Healthcare Information Management and Systems Society. (2018). Electronic health records. Retrieved from https:\/\/www.himss.org\/library\/ehr\/
Rao-Gupta, S., Kruger, D. Leak, L. D., Tieman, L. A., & Manworren, R. C. B. (2018). Leveraging interactive patient care technology to Improve pain management engagement. Pain Management Nursing, 19(3), 212\u2013221. doi:10.1016\/j.pmn.2017.11.002<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Skiba, D. (2017). Evaluation tools to appraise social media and mobile applications. Informatics, 4(3), 32\u201340. doi:10.3390\/informatics4030032<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Required Media
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Public Health Informatics [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Download Video w\/CC
Download Audio
Download Transcript
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Electronic Records and Managing IT Change [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Download Video w\/CC
Download Audio
Download Transcript<\/p>\n\n\n\nBy Day 7 of Week 8<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Submission and Grading Information<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Grid View
List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Be sure to address the following:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u00b7 Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.
77 (77%) \u2013 85 (85%)
The responses accurately and clearly identify 5 peer-reviewed research articles for the Assignment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
68 (68%) \u2013 76 (76%)
The responses identify 5 peer-reviewed research articles for the Assignment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
60 (60%) \u2013 67 (67%)
The responses vaguely or inaccurately identify 5 or less peer-reviewed articles for the Assignment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
0 (0%) \u2013 59 (59%)
The responses vaguely and inaccurately identify less than 5 peer-reviewed articles for the Assignment, or are missing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Written Expression and Formatting \u2013 Paragraph Development and Organization:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
5 (5%) \u2013 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
4 (4%) \u2013 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
3.5 (3.5%) \u2013 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
0 (0%) \u2013 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
Written Expression and Formatting \u2013 English writing standards:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
5 (5%) \u2013 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 (4%) \u2013 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3.5 (3.5%) \u2013 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
0 (0%) \u2013 3 (3%)
Contains many (\u2265 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader\u2019s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting \u2013 The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical\/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 (5%) \u2013 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
4 (4%) \u2013 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
3.5 (3.5%) \u2013 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.
0 (0%) \u2013 3 (3%)
Contains many (\u2265 5) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric<\/p>\n\n\n\nRead More:<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n