As you continue, thestudycorp.com<\/a> has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order <\/a>with us.<\/p>\n\n\n\n NRS 440 IOM Future of Nursing Report and Nursing Assignment<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n The key message contained in the IOM report on the future of nursing, leading change and advancing health was built on four main recommendations. First, there was need to allow all the nurse to practice to the full extend of their qualification and academic credentials. The state and the federal governments are supposed to work in tandem to ensure that this regulation is well implemented and the states that have restrictions on the nurse\u2019s scope of practice were to reconsider this regulation and provide a framework on which nurses with relevant training and qualification can deliver the care services required. The second recommendation emphasized on the need for nurses to seek further education and training. This was also meant to allow a smooth transition of nurses to a higher level of academic training and advance on their level of practice with limited obstacles. This was also meant to have a high competent nursing force that will be able to deliver quality care that is relevant to the emerging trends in the healthcare industry. It will also guarantee patients safety and satisfaction (Arzouman, 2016). The third recommendation was on the nurse work partnership with other healthcare professionals. The report emphasized on having the nurses recognized as full partners with other healthcare professionals. It is meant to have the nurses take full responsibility and be accountable to the actions that help promote better nursing practices, improved efficiency, reduced costs and the achievement of the collective organizational goals. Additionally, nurses have to take up active leadership roles and develop core competencies in leading healthcare organizations. Nurse were required to take an active role in crucial healthcare policy formulation and implementations. Nurses were called upon to take up positions in the healthcare boards, committees and commissions. This will help them in advancing the nurse advocacy agenda. The fourth recommendation was on the use of sophisticated data management systems in the healthcare industry. The effective management of data will be helpful in effective planning and the development of appropriate policies (Arzouman, 2016). The report recommended on having a collective database that will have all the information on the nurses from the total population of the nurses, their roles, employment data in all the areas of nursing. This will provide critical information on planning and future of the nursing decisions based on verifiable information.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Review the IOM report, \u201cThe Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health<\/a>,\u201d and explore the \u201cCampaign for Action: State Action Coalition\u201d website. In a 1,000-1,250 word paper, discuss the influence the IOM report and state-based action coalitions have had on nursing practice, nursing education, and nursing workforce development, and how they continue to advance the goals for the nursing profession.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Include the following:<\/p>\n\n\n\n You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n You are required to submit this assignment to\u00a0LopesWrite. A link to the\u00a0LopesWrite\u00a0technical support articles is located in\u00a0Class Resources\u00a0if you need assistance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As you continue, thestudycorp.com<\/a> has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order <\/a>with us.(Key Messages in the IOM Report Recommendations)<\/p>\n\n\n\n Robert Wood Foundation Committee Work and IOM Report<\/p>\n\n\n\n 16.5 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n A clear and accurate description of the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report is presented.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 14.69 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n A description of the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report is presented. There are slight inaccuracies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 13.04 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n A summary of the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report is presented. There are inaccuracies or misinterpretations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 12.38 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n An incomplete description of the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report is presented.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 0 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n A description of the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report is omitted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Key Messages Transforming Nursing<\/p>\n\n\n\n 24.75 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n The four key messages that structure the IOM report are clearly outlined. A description of how these transformed nursing practice, nursing education and training, nursing leadership, and nursing workforce development are thoroughly discussed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 22.03 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n The four key messages that structure the IOM report are outlined. A description of how these transformed key aspects of nursing is presented.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 19.55 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n The four key messages that structure the IOM report are generally outlined. A summary of how these transformed some aspects of nursing is presented, but there are some inaccuracies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 18.56 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Fewer than four key messages are presented, and the messages contain inaccuracies. An incomplete discussion on how they transformed nursing is presented.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 0 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n The four key messages are omitted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n State-Based Action Coalitions and Their Help in Advancing Goals form IOM Report<\/p>\n\n\n\n 24.75 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n The role of state-based action coalitions is thoroughly discussed. A detailed and accurate discussion of how they help advance the goals in the IOM report is presented.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 22.03 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n The role of state-based action coalitions is discussed. A discussion of how they help advance the goals in the IOM report is presented.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 19.55 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n The role of state-based action coalitions is summarized. A summary of how they help advance the goals in the IOM report is presented.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 18.56 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n The role of state-based action coalitions is incomplete. It is unclear how these advance the goals in the IOM report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 0 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n The role of state-based action coalitions is omitted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n State Action Coalition Initiatives Advancing Nursing Profession<\/p>\n\n\n\n 33 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they advance the nursing profession are thoroughly discussed. The discussion demonstrates a clear understanding of the state action committee and the role in advancing the nursing profession.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 29.37 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they advance the nursing profession are discussed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 26.07 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition are summarized. How these initiatives advance the nursing profession are generally discussed. There are some inaccuracies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As you continue, thestudycorp.com<\/a> has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order <\/a>with us.(Key Messages in the IOM Report Recommendations)<\/p>\n\n\n\n NRS 440 IOM Future of Nursing Report and Nursing Assignment<\/p>\n\n\n\n 24.75 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Only one initiative spearheaded by a state action coalition is presented. The narrative contains omissions and inaccuracies. How these initiatives advance the nursing profession are incomplete.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 0 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition are omitted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Barriers to Advancement<\/p>\n\n\n\n 33 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state are thoroughly explored and how nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers are thoroughly described.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 29.37 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state and how nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers are described.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 26.07 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state are presented. How nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is summarized. There are inaccuracies, or more information is needed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 24.75 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state are unclear. How nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is incomplete.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 0 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state are omitted. How nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is omitted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Thesis Development and Purpose<\/p>\n\n\n\n 8.25 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 7.34 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 6.52 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 6.19 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 0 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Argument Logic and Construction<\/p>\n\n\n\n 8.25 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 7.34 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 6.52 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 6.19 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 0 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)<\/p>\n\n\n\n 8.25 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 7.34 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As you continue, thestudycorp.com<\/a> has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is\u00a0place an order\u00a0<\/a>with us.(Key Messages in the IOM Report Recommendations)<\/p>\n\n\n\n 6.52 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 6.19 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 0 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)<\/p>\n\n\n\n 3.3 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n All format elements are correct.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2.94 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2.61 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2.47 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 0 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)<\/p>\n\n\n\n 4.95 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 4.41 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 3.91 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 3.71 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 0 points<\/p>\n\n\n\n Sources are not documented.Total 165 points<\/p>\n\n\n\nNRS 440 IOM Future of Nursing Report and Nursing Assignment<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Key Messages in the IOM Report Recommendations<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Assessment Description<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
![\"Key](\"https:\/\/privateessaywriters.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/order-1024x334.jpg\" "\\"\\"")
IOM Future of Nursing Report and Nursing \u2013 Rubric<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Criteria Description<\/h6>\n\n\n\n
5. Excellent<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
4. Good<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
3. Satisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
2. Less Than Satisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
1. Unsatisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
Criteria Description<\/h6>\n\n\n\n
5. Excellent<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
4. Good<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
3. Satisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
2. Less Than Satisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
1. Unsatisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
Criteria Description<\/h6>\n\n\n\n
5. Excellent<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
4. Good<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
3. Satisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
2. Less Than Satisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
1. Unsatisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
Criteria Description<\/h6>\n\n\n\n
5. Excellent<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
4. Good<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
3. Satisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
2. Less Than Satisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
1. Unsatisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
Criteria Description<\/h6>\n\n\n\n
5. Excellent<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
4. Good<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
3. Satisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
2. Less Than Satisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
1. Unsatisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
Criteria Description<\/h6>\n\n\n\n
5. Excellent<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
4. Good<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
3. Satisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
2. Less Than Satisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
1. Unsatisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
Criteria Description<\/h6>\n\n\n\n
5. Excellent<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
4. Good<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
3. Satisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
2. Less Than Satisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
1. Unsatisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
Criteria Description<\/h6>\n\n\n\n
5. Excellent<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
4. Good<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
3. Satisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
2. Less Than Satisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
1. Unsatisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
Criteria Description<\/h6>\n\n\n\n
5. Excellent<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
4. Good<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
3. Satisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
2. Less Than Satisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
1. Unsatisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
Criteria Description<\/h6>\n\n\n\n
5. Excellent<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
4. Good<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
3. Satisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
2. Less Than Satisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
1. Unsatisfactory<\/h5>\n\n\n\n
Read More:<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n