Working on a research proposal or project? here’s a comparison on systematic review versus literature review vs systematic literature review
Systematic review versus Literature review vs systematic literature review
What is a Literature Review?
A literature review is a comprehensive summary and evaluation of the existing research and scholarly literature on a particular topic. It aims to provide an overview of the current knowledge, identify gaps or contradictions in the existing research, and establish the context for new research. Literature reviews can be standalone pieces of work or part of a larger research project, such as a thesis or dissertation.
Purposes of a Literature Review:
- To identify and critically analyze the existing body of knowledge on a topic
- To evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of previous studies
- To synthesize and integrate findings from multiple sources
- To identify contradictions, inconsistencies, or gaps in the literature
- To provide a foundation and context for new research questions or hypotheses
Process of Conducting a Literature Review:
- Define the scope and objectives of the review
- Develop a search strategy and identify relevant databases and sources
- Apply inclusion and exclusion criteria to select relevant studies
- Critically appraise and evaluate the quality of the included studies
- Synthesize and integrate the findings from multiple sources
- Identify gaps, inconsistencies, or areas for future research
Example: If you are conducting research on the effectiveness of a particular teaching method, your literature review would involve searching for and critically analyzing previous studies on that teaching method, educational theories related to it, and any other relevant literature. You would evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each study, synthesize the overall findings, and identify any gaps or contradictions in the existing research.
What is a Systematic Review?
A systematic review is a type of literature review that follows a rigorous, standardized methodology to identify, evaluate, and synthesize all relevant studies on a specific research question. It is designed to minimize bias and provide a comprehensive and reproducible overview of the available evidence on a topic. Systematic reviews are considered the highest level of evidence in evidence-based practice and are often used to inform policy decisions, clinical guidelines, and future research.
Purposes of a Systematic Review:
- To provide a comprehensive and unbiased synthesis of the available evidence on a specific research question
- To identify and evaluate all relevant studies, regardless of their publication status or language
- To minimize bias and increase transparency and reproducibility
- To inform decision-making, policy development, and evidence-based practice
- To identify areas for future research
Process of Conducting a Systematic Review:
- Define a clear, focused research question
- Develop a comprehensive search strategy and identify relevant databases
- Establish clear inclusion and exclusion criteria for study selection
- Critically appraise the quality of included studies using standardized tools
- Extract and synthesize data from included studies using meta-analysis or other appropriate methods
- Assess the overall quality and strength of the evidence
- Present the findings and make recommendations based on the evidence
Example: If you want to determine the most effective treatment for a particular medical condition, you would conduct a systematic review by defining a clear research question (e.g., “What is the most effective pharmacological treatment for condition X?”). You would develop a comprehensive search strategy, search multiple databases for relevant studies, apply predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, critically appraise the quality of the included studies, and synthesize the findings from all the included studies using meta-analysis or other appropriate methods.
Comparison of Literature Review versus Systematic Review, and Systematic Literature Review
| Aspect | Literature Review | Systematic Review | Systematic Literature Review |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | A comprehensive summary and synthesis of existing research on a particular topic, providing an overview of current knowledge and identifying gaps or areas for further study. | A rigorous, protocol-driven approach to synthesizing evidence from multiple studies, typically used in healthcare and social sciences to inform evidence-based practice. | A hybrid approach that combines elements of both systematic and literature reviews, aiming for a comprehensive and structured synthesis of existing research on a specific topic. |
| Purpose | To provide a broad overview of a topic and identify trends, themes, and gaps in the literature. | To answer a specific research question using a rigorous, replicable methodology. | To provide a comprehensive overview of a topic using a systematic approach, but with more flexibility than a full systematic review. |
| Methodology | Less structured, may vary depending on the researcher’s approach. | Highly structured, follows a predefined protocol. | Structured, but may be less rigid than a full systematic review. |
| Search Strategy | Comprehensive but may not be exhaustive. | Exhaustive, aims to identify all relevant studies. | Comprehensive and systematic, but may not be as exhaustive as a full systematic review. |
| Quality Assessment | May or may not include formal quality assessment of studies. | Includes rigorous quality assessment of included studies. | Usually includes quality assessment, but may be less formal than in a systematic review. |
| Data Synthesis | Narrative synthesis, may include some quantitative elements. | Often includes meta-analysis or other statistical synthesis methods. | Usually narrative synthesis, may include some quantitative elements. |
| Steps to Conduct | 1. Choose topic and research question 2. Search for relevant literature 3. Evaluate and select sources 4. Analyze and synthesize information 5. Organize review (e.g., chronologically, thematically) 6. Write review 7. Revise and edit | 1. Formulate clear research question 2. Develop protocol (including inclusion/exclusion criteria) 3. Conduct comprehensive literature search 4. Screen and select studies based on criteria 5. Assess quality of included studies 6. Extract and analyze data 7. Synthesize findings (may include meta-analysis) 8. Interpret results and draw conclusions 9. Write and publish review | 1. Define research question and objectives 2. Develop search strategy and protocol 3. Conduct comprehensive literature search 4. Screen and select relevant studies 5. Critically appraise included studies 6. Extract and synthesize data 7. Analyze and interpret findings 8. Write review, including methodology and results 9. Peer review and publication |
| Typical Time Frame | Weeks to months | Months to years | Months to a year |
| Bias Risk | Higher risk of bias due to less structured approach | Lower risk of bias due to rigorous methodology | Moderate risk of bias, depending on the specific approach taken |
| Reproducibility | Lower reproducibility | High reproducibility | Moderate to high reproducibility, depending on the specific approach |
Similarities between Literature Reviews and Systematic Reviews:
- Objective: Both literature reviews and systematic reviews aim to summarize and evaluate existing research and knowledge on a particular topic.
- Search Process: Both involve developing a search strategy, identifying relevant databases and sources, and applying inclusion and exclusion criteria to select relevant studies or literature.
- Critical Appraisal: Both involve critically appraising and evaluating the quality of the included studies or literature. This step is crucial to assess the validity, reliability, and relevance of the existing research.
- Synthesis: Both involve synthesizing and integrating findings from multiple sources to provide an overall understanding of the topic or research question.
- Identifying Gaps: Both can be used to identify gaps, inconsistencies, or areas for future research within the existing literature or body of knowledge.
- Context for New Research: Both can provide a foundation and context for developing new research questions, hypotheses, or studies.
- Sources: Both can draw upon a variety of sources, including peer-reviewed journal articles, books, conference proceedings, and other scholarly publications.
- Structure: Both typically follow a similar structure, including an introduction, methodology, results or findings, and discussion or conclusion sections.
- Ethical Considerations: Both literature reviews and systematic reviews should be conducted with ethical considerations, such as avoiding plagiarism, ensuring proper citation practices, and maintaining objectivity in the interpretation and synthesis of findings.
- Importance in Research: Both literature reviews and systematic reviews are essential components of the research process, as they contribute to the advancement of knowledge and inform future research directions.
Key Differences between Literature Reviews and Systematic Reviews
Methodology:
- Literature reviews generally have a more flexible and narrative approach, allowing for a broader exploration of the topic.
- Systematic reviews follow a strict, predefined protocol and methodology, including clearly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, a comprehensive search strategy, and critical appraisal of included studies using standardized tools.
Comprehensiveness:
- Literature reviews may not include every available study on a topic, as they may selectively focus on the most relevant or influential works.
- Systematic reviews aim to identify and include all relevant studies, regardless of their publication status or language, to minimize bias and provide a comprehensive overview of the evidence.
Reproducibility:
- Literature reviews may be influenced by the author’s subjective interpretations and selection of studies.
- Systematic reviews strive for transparency and reproducibility by clearly documenting the search strategy, inclusion criteria, data extraction processes, and quality assessment methods, allowing others to replicate the review.
Synthesis of Evidence
- Literature reviews may synthesize findings narratively or qualitatively.
- Systematic reviews often use quantitative methods, such as meta-analysis, to statistically synthesize and analyze the data from included studies.
Purpose:
- Literature reviews are often used to provide background information, identify gaps in the literature, and establish the context for new research.
- Systematic reviews are primarily used to synthesize the available evidence on a specific research question, inform decision-making, and guide future research or practice.
In summary, while both literature reviews and systematic reviews involve summarizing and evaluating existing research, systematic reviews follow a more rigorous and structured methodology to minimize bias and provide a comprehensive and reproducible synthesis of the available evidence on a specific research question. Systematic reviews are considered the highest level of evidence and are essential for informing evidence-based practice and decision-making.
Related Articles
Term Papers versus Research Papers and How to Write them
130 + Best Research Topic about Nursing – Types & How to Choose a Nursing Research Topic
The difference between a systematic review and a literature review
Common Definitions and Comparisons on different types of reviews
Systematic literature review definition: A comprehensive, transparent, and replicable review of existing literature on a specific topic, following a predefined protocol to minimize bias. Example: A systematic review of the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy for treating depression in adolescents.
Literature review vs systematic literature review:
Literature review: Broader, less structured overview of a topic.
Systematic literature review: More rigorous, follows a specific methodology.
Example: A literature review might discuss general trends in climate change research, while a systematic literature review would analyze specific interventions for reducing carbon emissions using predefined criteria.
Primary limitation to literature reviews versus systematic reviews: Literature reviews are more susceptible to bias and may not be as comprehensive or reproducible as systematic reviews.
Integrative literature review versus systematic review:
- Integrative review: Synthesizes findings from various study types to provide a comprehensive understanding.
- Systematic review: Focuses on a specific question, uses strict inclusion criteria. Example: An integrative review might examine overall patient care in hospitals, while a systematic review would focus on the effectiveness of a specific treatment for a particular condition.
Systematic versus targeted literature review:
- Systematic: Comprehensive, follows a strict protocol.
- Targeted: Focuses on a specific aspect of a topic, may be less comprehensive. Example: A systematic review might examine all interventions for obesity, while a targeted review might focus only on dietary interventions.
Literature review vs systematic review vs meta-analysis
- Literature review: Broad overview.
- Systematic review: Rigorous, protocol-driven review.
- Meta-analysis: Statistical analysis of combined results from multiple studies. Example: A literature review might discuss trends in cancer treatments, a systematic review would analyze specific treatment outcomes, and a meta-analysis would statistically combine results from multiple studies on a particular treatment.
Narrative literature review vs systematic:
- Narrative: Less structured, often reflects author’s perspective.
- Systematic: Structured, follows a predefined protocol. Example: A narrative review might discuss the history and development of artificial intelligence, while a systematic review would analyze the effectiveness of AI in medical diagnosis using specific criteria.
Structured literature review vs systematic review
- Structured: Follows a predetermined format but may be less rigorous than systematic.
- Systematic: Follows a strict, pre-registered protocol. Example: A structured review might organize findings on renewable energy sources by type, while a systematic review would analyze the efficiency of specific solar panel technologies using predefined methods.
Scoping review vs systematic review vs literature review
- Scoping: Maps key concepts and types of evidence in a research area.
- Systematic: Answers a specific question using rigorous methods.
- Literature: Provides a broad overview of a topic. Example: A scoping review might map the range of interventions for childhood obesity, a systematic review would analyze the effectiveness of specific interventions, and a literature review would provide an overview of childhood obesity research.
Extended literature review vs systematic review
- Extended: More comprehensive than a standard literature review but less rigorous than systematic.
- Systematic: Follows a strict, predefined protocol. Example: An extended review might provide an in-depth analysis of climate change impacts, while a systematic review would focus on the effectiveness of specific mitigation strategies.
Traditional vs systematic literature review
- Traditional: Less structured, may be subject to author bias.
- Systematic: Follows a predefined, rigorous methodology to minimize bias. Example: A traditional review might discuss general trends in educational technology, while a systematic review would analyze the impact of specific technologies on student achievement using predefined criteria.
Start by filling this short order form order.studyinghq.com
And then follow the progressive flow.Â
Having an issue, chat with us here
Regards,
Cathy, CS.Â
