📕 Studying HQ

  Systematic Review vs Literature Review

What is a Literature Review?

A literature review is a comprehensive summary and evaluation of the existing research and scholarly literature on a particular topic. It aims to provide an overview of the current knowledge, identify gaps or contradictions in the existing research, and establish the context for new research. Literature reviews can be standalone pieces of work or part of a larger research project, such as a thesis or dissertation.

Purposes of a Literature Review:

  • To identify and critically analyze the existing body of knowledge on a topic
  • To evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of previous studies
  • To synthesize and integrate findings from multiple sources
  • To identify contradictions, inconsistencies, or gaps in the literature
  • To provide a foundation and context for new research questions or hypotheses

Process of Conducting a Literature Review:

  1. Define the scope and objectives of the review
  2. Develop a search strategy and identify relevant databases and sources
  3. Apply inclusion and exclusion criteria to select relevant studies
  4. Critically appraise and evaluate the quality of the included studies
  5. Synthesize and integrate the findings from multiple sources
  6. Identify gaps, inconsistencies, or areas for future research

Example: If you are conducting research on the effectiveness of a particular teaching method, your literature review would involve searching for and critically analyzing previous studies on that teaching method, educational theories related to it, and any other relevant literature. You would evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each study, synthesize the overall findings, and identify any gaps or contradictions in the existing research.

What is a Systematic Review?

A systematic review is a type of literature review that follows a rigorous, standardized methodology to identify, evaluate, and synthesize all relevant studies on a specific research question. It is designed to minimize bias and provide a comprehensive and reproducible overview of the available evidence on a topic. Systematic reviews are considered the highest level of evidence in evidence-based practice and are often used to inform policy decisions, clinical guidelines, and future research.

Purposes of a Systematic Review:

  • To provide a comprehensive and unbiased synthesis of the available evidence on a specific research question
  • To identify and evaluate all relevant studies, regardless of their publication status or language
  • To minimize bias and increase transparency and reproducibility
  • To inform decision-making, policy development, and evidence-based practice
  • To identify areas for future research

Process of Conducting a Systematic Review:

  1. Define a clear, focused research question
  2. Develop a comprehensive search strategy and identify relevant databases
  3. Establish clear inclusion and exclusion criteria for study selection
  4. Critically appraise the quality of included studies using standardized tools
  5. Extract and synthesize data from included studies using meta-analysis or other appropriate methods
  6. Assess the overall quality and strength of the evidence
  7. Present the findings and make recommendations based on the evidence

Example: If you want to determine the most effective treatment for a particular medical condition, you would conduct a systematic review by defining a clear research question (e.g., “What is the most effective pharmacological treatment for condition X?”). You would develop a comprehensive search strategy, search multiple databases for relevant studies, apply predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, critically appraise the quality of the included studies, and synthesize the findings from all the included studies using meta-analysis or other appropriate methods.

Similarities between Literature Reviews and Systematic Reviews:

  • Objective: Both literature reviews and systematic reviews aim to summarize and evaluate existing research and knowledge on a particular topic.
  • Search Process: Both involve developing a search strategy, identifying relevant databases and sources, and applying inclusion and exclusion criteria to select relevant studies or literature.
  • Critical Appraisal: Both involve critically appraising and evaluating the quality of the included studies or literature. This step is crucial to assess the validity, reliability, and relevance of the existing research.
  • Synthesis: Both involve synthesizing and integrating findings from multiple sources to provide an overall understanding of the topic or research question.
  • Identifying Gaps: Both can be used to identify gaps, inconsistencies, or areas for future research within the existing literature or body of knowledge.
  • Context for New Research: Both can provide a foundation and context for developing new research questions, hypotheses, or studies.
  • Sources: Both can draw upon a variety of sources, including peer-reviewed journal articles, books, conference proceedings, and other scholarly publications.
  • Structure: Both typically follow a similar structure, including an introduction, methodology, results or findings, and discussion or conclusion sections.
  • Ethical Considerations: Both literature reviews and systematic reviews should be conducted with ethical considerations, such as avoiding plagiarism, ensuring proper citation practices, and maintaining objectivity in the interpretation and synthesis of findings.
  • Importance in Research: Both literature reviews and systematic reviews are essential components of the research process, as they contribute to the advancement of knowledge and inform future research directions.

Key Differences between Literature Reviews and Systematic Reviews

Methodology:

    • Literature reviews generally have a more flexible and narrative approach, allowing for a broader exploration of the topic.
    • Systematic reviews follow a strict, predefined protocol and methodology, including clearly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, a comprehensive search strategy, and critical appraisal of included studies using standardized tools.

    Comprehensiveness:

      • Literature reviews may not include every available study on a topic, as they may selectively focus on the most relevant or influential works.
      • Systematic reviews aim to identify and include all relevant studies, regardless of their publication status or language, to minimize bias and provide a comprehensive overview of the evidence.

      Reproducibility:

        • Literature reviews may be influenced by the author’s subjective interpretations and selection of studies.
        • Systematic reviews strive for transparency and reproducibility by clearly documenting the search strategy, inclusion criteria, data extraction processes, and quality assessment methods, allowing others to replicate the review.

        Synthesis of Evidence:

          • Literature reviews may synthesize findings narratively or qualitatively.
          • Systematic reviews often use quantitative methods, such as meta-analysis, to statistically synthesize and analyze the data from included studies.

          Purpose:

            • Literature reviews are often used to provide background information, identify gaps in the literature, and establish the context for new research.
            • Systematic reviews are primarily used to synthesize the available evidence on a specific research question, inform decision-making, and guide future research or practice.

            In summary, while both literature reviews and systematic reviews involve summarizing and evaluating existing research, systematic reviews follow a more rigorous and structured methodology to minimize bias and provide a comprehensive and reproducible synthesis of the available evidence on a specific research question. Systematic reviews are considered the highest level of evidence and are essential for informing evidence-based practice and decision-making.

            Related Articles

            Term Papers versus Research Papers and How to Write them

            130 + Best Research Topic about Nursing – Types & How to Choose a Nursing Research Topic

            The difference between a systematic review and a literature review

            Start by filling this short order form order.studyinghq.com

            And then follow the progressive flow. 

            Having an issue, chat with us here

            Regards,

            Cathy, CS. 

            New Concept ? Let a subject expert write your paper for You​

            Have a subject expert Write for You Now

            Have a subject expert finish your paper for You

            Edit My Paper For Me

            Have an Expert Write Your Dissertation's Chapter