Emotion Comparison Matrix Assignment 1 Solution

Emotion Comparison Matrix

Remember to submit your work following the file naming convention FirstInitial.LastName_M01.docx. For example, J.Smith_M01.docx. Remember that it is not necessary to manually type in the file extension; it will automatically append.

Start by reading and following these instructions:

1. Quickly skim the questions or assignment below and the assignment rubric to help you focus.

2. Read the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.

3. Consider the discussion and the any insights you gained from it.

4. Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling.

Assignment:

Emotion – Comparison Matrix (Literature Review)

Now that you are familiar with how to properly conduct a sample literature review, you will practice this skill as you compare articles based on the area of emotion which most interests you. Empirical articles present original research conducted or personally observed by the author(s). For this assignment, locate the six perennial questions in your text and decide which question focuses on the area of emotion you would like to research. You are to select 3 articles for comparison, each within the realm of your chosen question focus from the text readings. The articles you select must include the following elements: a description of the study, an introduction, a research question, an explanation of the study’s methodology, a presentation of the results of the study, and a conclusion that discusses the results and suggests topics for further study.

To successfully complete the assignment:

• Locate three (3) empirical, research-based articles.  Each article should be within the realm of your chosen question focus from the text readings.
• Copy and paste the below Comparison Matrix (Literature Review) table into a Word document.
• Completely fill in the Comparison Matrix (Literature Review) table with information from the three (3) articles.
• Use the information from the completed Comparison Matrix (Literature Review) table to write a summary paper of 1000-1500 words that compares the three empirical articles. The paper will include the following elements:

-Comparison of the purposes of each study and the authors’ statements of why the study is important

-Discussion of the conclusions from the studies

-Comparison of topics suggested for future study

Submit the Comparison Matrix (Literature Review) table and the paper as a single deliverable. Do so by placing the table at the end of the paper, in an Appendix.

Comparison Matrix (Literature Review) 

Article 1

Article 2

Article 3

Title/Author(s)

Purpose of the Stud

Research Question(s

Sample Population(s)

Limitations

Assignment Expectations

Length: 1000 “ 1500 words (not including the Comparison Matrix); answers must thoroughly address the prompts in a clear, concise manner.

Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. Include the Comparison Matrix as a table at the end of the paper. These do not count towards the minimum word count for this assignment.

References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least three (3) scholarly sources to support your claims.

Format: Save your assignment as a Microsoft Word document (.doc or .docx).

File name: Name your saved file according to your first initial, last name, and the assignment number (for example, RHall Assignment 1.docx)

Solution

Emotion Comparison Matrix

Article 1

The first study was done by Gonzalez-Robles et al. (2018) on “Comorbidity and diagnosis distribution in trans-diagnostic treatments for emotional disorders: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.” It was conducted for three main reasons: first, to determine whether trans-diagnostic treatments for Emotion Disorder (ED) incorporate the evaluation of commodity treatment response. Second, to determine the types of diagnosis targeted during trans-diagnostic treatment, and finally, to determine how diagnoses are distributed at the baseline level of the studies. Notably, this study was significant since previous research studies do not evaluate the reporting and assessment of comorbidity in trials analyzing the trans-diagnostic protocols. This study considers the significance of comorbidity in patient outcomes, such as the severity of treatment and increase in relapse for those suffering from depressive disorders.

Are you looking for answers to a similar assignment? Thestudycorp.com has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is place an order with us.

Generally, the study involved a systematic search of literature from databases such as PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (Gonzalez-Robles et al., 2018). The search generated 52 randomized controlled trials, consisting of 7007 adult participants. The study’s findings showed that only 40% of the studies indicated incidences of at baseline while also examining the impacts of the interventions directed towards comorbid disorders. The results confirmed further that most trans-diagnostic treatments only target Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD), Somatoform Disorder (SAD), and depression. As a result, it concluded that most patients having comorbid disorders show higher levels of severity, disability and chronicity from the disorders. The trans-diagnostic approach for treating ED offers the most appropriate and safe management for comorbidity. Henceforth, the study suggests that future research should be conducted on diagnoses less targeted in trans-diagnostic treatments, like anxiety depression, to explore how trans-diagnostic treatment can be applied to these disorders.

Article 2

The second study was performed on “Emotion dysregulation in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a meta-analysis” (Beheshti, Chavanon & Christiansen, 2020). Its purpose was to identify the characteristics of ED in adult Attention-Deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Second, to conduct a meta-analysis for examining the magnitudes of the relations between patients with ADHD and those with healthier bodies and the strength of the relations between ADHD symptom values, emotional disorders and their facets. Notably, the study involved reviewing electronic databases such as PubMed and PsycINFO. A total of thirteen studies were identified to include reports on measures of emotion regulation in adults over 18 years. The study results showed that adults having ADHD indicated elevated levels of emotion disorder more than their healthier counterparts. The symptom severity correlates significantly with the ED. Furthermore, there was a close correlation between the negative emotional responses and the levels of severity based on the intermediate dimensions of ED. This study is essential since it is the first of its kind to study meta-analysis on patients suffering from ADHD

Therefore, the study concludes that ED is distinctively a characteristic of adult ADHD (Beheshti, Chavanon & Christiansen, 2020). In addition, dimensions of ED like emotion recognition, liability, and responses correlate significantly with the symptoms of ADHD. Also, it highlighted that classic domain such as hyperactivity, inattention, and impulsivity does not comprehensively explain emotion dysregulation in adults. Henceforth, the diagnosing and treatment of adult ADHD should consider incorporating the assessment and targeting of emotion regulation in clinical practice. The study cautioned future researchers on the need to clarify the interaction between ED and the symptoms of ADHD, comorbid conditions, and moderators like the demographic setting of the patient.

Article 3

The final study was done by Hallion et al. (2028) on “Psychometric Properties of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) and Its Short Forms in Adults with Emotional Disorders.” The study aimed to determine the Difficulty in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) psychometric features for older individuals with emotional dysregulation. Second, to determine the extent to which DEES and its subscales could predict responses to cognitive-behavioural treatment (CBT). Its final objective was to examine the psychometric characteristics of shorter versions of DERS, including DERS-SF, DERS-18, and DERS16. Generally, the study was critical since it was the first to use the structural equation models (SEM) framework for examining the predictive reliability of DERS. The study involves examining the psychometric characteristics of DERS and its standard shorter versions. The results indicated strong internal consistency for the subscales except for awareness. It also showed improved CBT response at the intake due to severe emotion regulation and a negative CBT response during stress, resulting from more severe impairment in goal-oriented activity.

Notably, Hallion et al. (2028) conclude that most clinical and research institutions have a higher potential to accept the use of short forms of DERS to reduce the burden on the participants. The DERS has a robust bi-factor structure and internal consistency with the primarily used subscales, giving it a higher potential for predictive utility. This means that clinical practitioners need to pay attention to reporting the potential of engaging in goal-oriented behavior during stress. The study recommends that further research be conducted using alternative measures of emotion regulation and other related constructs like cognitive control. This helps in effectively examining the reliability of DERS in measuring emotion regulation. Additionally, further research should clarify the mechanisms through which DERS predicts treatment to determine its treatment implications.

References

Beheshti, A., Chavanon, M. L., & Christiansen, H. (2020). Emotion dysregulation in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a meta-analysis. BMC psychiatry, 20(1), 1-11.

Gonzalez-Robles, A., Diaz-Garcia, A., Miguel, C., Garcia-Palacios, A., & Botella, C. (2018). Comorbidity and diagnosis distribution in trans-diagnostic treatments for emotional disorders: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One, 13(11), e0207396.

Hallion, L. S., Steinman, S. A., Tolin, D. F., & Diefenbach, G. J. (2018). Psychometric properties of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) and its short forms in adults with emotional disorders. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 539

Appendix